So I’ve sorta been doing that for a few years by now. My old Reddit account had a Snow Angel T Shirt male user name as I mainly used it in video game related subs. I mostly stopped using it about 3 years ago. My current account is I say more neutral to fem leaning and mostly used in small subs (<10K users) but in larger subs that I used to visit on my older account, there definitely has been a change in how people interact with me. I used to comment far more frequently in subs like r/AmItheAsshole but mostly stopped doing that because despite my style of arguing (wild, rambly, not all that coherent sometimes) not changing, I get attacked for my opinions far more often now, with far more downvotes on average. Similar situation when I create posts (again I'm not a master poster but mediocre posts of mine would never be attacked as extremely on my old account). Note: I'm trans which becomes obvious when u take a Snow Angel T Shirt at my account so my experience might not be anywhere close to representative
Snow Angel T Shirt hoodie, tank top, sweater and long sleeve t-shirt
“This kind of shit” is the Snow Angel T Shirt of thing that peer review is meant to examine. One reason peer review isn’t fast. Scientific days always uncertainty and you can’t “lie” with statistics but you can misrepresent data with bad statistics that probably won’t pass peer review. You have to know how inaccurate your data is because there is never perfect accuracy. This example doesn’t work because the Snow Angel T Shirt is about theoretical numbers and you’re referring to actual data when mentioning statistics. But for argument’s sake let’s say we have real data and we actually know the uncertainty to two decimal places:In other words, in the circumstances the two data points added together could add up to something closer to four or five. You can’t “lie” with statistics. You can lie by misreporting data, or you can mislead a noncritical reader which is what happens often in the popular press. But statistics itself does not “lie”. This really illustrates the problem with the popular press reporting on so many pre-prints involving the COVID-19 pandemic. Everyone thinks just because you can pull a pre-prints from the prestigious institution that everything in it should be taken in fact, but a pre-print has not been through peer review. The Snow Angel T Shirt questioning of statistics is so critical. Look what happened with the Stanford/Santa Rosa study. They grossly overestimated the prevalence due to some bad statistics – very early on, were estimating that tens of thousands of people in California had been infected with the virus, but a month later only a dozen or so had died. Based on this, they issued a pre-print which was repeated over and over again in international newspapers telling people that the virus is nothing to worry about because it’s far less deadly than anyone imagined. Except that once the pre-print was in circulation, other researchers in statistics and public health started analyzing it and realized that the prevalence they were reporting (2.4%) was within the uncertainty of the false positive rate (0.8 – 2.6%). In other words, the vast majority of the “prevalence” was actually the Snow Angel T Shirt of testing errors. This would have been quickly spotted in academic peer review, because it’s not easy to lie with statistics.